Our society depends upon government
agencies to look after and manage support programs for the homeless living on
the streets. County social service agencies provide enough EBT food and cash
benefits to eligible individuals to help sustain life, a few cities have
offered access to empty lots to camp out, and a few cities have even spent
hundreds of thousands of dollars to build “tiny home” complexes to shelter minimal
numbers in need. Obvious by their actions, government entities do not understand
the homeless problem, and their attempts to fix the problem has only enabled
street life, helping only the individuals who desire to stay on the streets.
To provide solutions to the homeless
problem, we must first understand who these people are and then understand a
single solution will not work. The homeless can be divided into three different
classes:
Class 1: On the streets by negative
circumstances. The lack
of job skills and employment, drug and alcohol addiction, and the lack of or
lose of family/friend support forces individuals and families to live on the
streets. Once on the streets, the lack of resources and support makes it nearly
impossible to recover to normal life.
Class 2: On the streets by physical
and/or mental illness. These
individuals that lack support often end up living on the streets. Society lacks
the resources and support system to care for these people that causes worsening
conditions and even death. Its common to see a combination of class 1 and class
2 individuals as street life is prolonged.
Class 3: On the streets by choice. These individuals enjoy the freedom of
not having to work and expect other people to care for them. They do not
respect the rights of others and can be defined as “bums”. These people mingle
with class 1 and class 2 individuals and take the free ride on the backs of
people in need. Many people in society look down on the homeless due to class 3
individuals and government agencies seem to prioritize aid to the homeless based
on resistance to help class 3 mentality.
The only successful solution to the
homeless problem is to provide shelter, food, and rehabilitation services to
class 1 and 2 individuals as a gateway to normal life or acceptance to
long-term programs, and to eliminate access to street life to class 3
individuals. The 1BED4ALL project has developed a self-sustainable homeless
rehabilitation facility concept that would lift people-in-need off the streets onto
a path to normal life. Class 3 individuals would be welcome to participate but
many will reject such a facility’s structure and choose to leave. If the living
on public streets and land became illegal, these people would be forced to
leave the area or adapt to jail life. Such a solution would help people-in-need
and earn the acceptance of society’s majority.
Many could say that the cost to provide
shelter, food, and rehabilitation services to class 1 and 2 individuals would
be too expensive and unrealistic. Well, the fact of the matter is that such
facilities would be able to operate using existing benefits offered to the
homeless, and ensure benefits, such as Medi-Cal, are sustained through facility
participation.
Society also
needs to change the mentality of how our government agencies deal with the
homeless. The country of Finland’s homeless program has been successful because
government social workers are placed in the buildings housing the homeless.
This ensures that people in need have access to services which help them
rehabilitate.
Social workers
need to be relocated to these pay-to-stay rehabilitation facilities, along with
easy access to other agencies, such as the US Social Security Office and
Veteran Affairs. The attitude of “you must come here”, “you must have an
appointment”, and “all your paperwork must be in order” to receive benefits
must be changed. Every person we do not help, will stay on the streets and
probably become physically and/or mentally ill, costing the taxpayers in long-term
medical treatments, or even death.
A pay-to-stay
homeless rehabilitation facility in which the residents have proper, real-time
access to social services could provide the following services, even at a 70%
paid occupancy rate:
1.
Dorm-style
housing with restrooms and showers
2.
Breakfast,
lunch and dinner
3.
Laundry
services
4.
Medical
and dental services
5.
Mental
health and group therapy
6.
Access
to Social Services
7.
Drug
rehabilitation
8.
Computer/Internet
access
9.
Transportation
services
10. Pet vet and care services
11. Family services
12. Access to a mailing address
13. Barber services
14. Police and security protection
15. Storage for belongings
To recap: We
can provide the homeless with full-service shelter and rehabilitation services
at no additional cost to the taxpayer, utilizing existing social service
benefits. ZERO ADDITIONAL FUNDS ARE NEEDED!
Now
for the hard part! To provide all these services, we’ll need well designed
facilities. The Governor of California has recently said he wants to spend over
1 billion dollars to fix the homeless problem in California. Many other politicians
are suggesting the use of old government buildings to house the homeless,
buildings not designed to house large groups of people that could cause safety
and logistical concerns.
Yes,
the current state of the homeless problem will require society to provide
housing, which is going to cost us all a lot of money. The best solution would
be to build well-designed facilities from the ground up. Such facilities would
handle dorm-style living and food service amenities to efficiently feed large
groups of people logistically at low costs. Retrofitting old buildings to meet
the requirements to provide all the services listed above would probably cost
more than building a well-designed facility from the ground up, obviously in
areas where property is available. Areas such as San Francisco, would have the
requirement to retrofit and such work would have to be well-designed.
The
1BED4ALL project has developed a 464-bed facility with an estimated build cost
of 3 million dollars and a 928-bed facility with an estimated build cost of 4
million dollars. The Facility Build & Operational Overview details our
research, estimated costs and feasibility of the monthly self-sustainable
operations.
The
1BED4ALL project is also developing a facility management software application
that will allow shelters to provide important rehabilitation services with ease
and automate the EBT and other government billing interfaces.
Converting
free shelters to pay-to-stay facilities could be the fastest way to get help to
the homeless. We could provide training to these shelters, manage the program,
and provide the software needed to make such facilities successful.
The
1BED4ALL Solution to the Problem in California
We
suggest that California adopt a “pay-to-stay” homeless rehabilitation facility
program in which shelters that agree to provide all the services discussed in
this plan, would be granted access to bill resident EBT cards $12 a night.
Converting
Free Shelters
1Bed4All
proposes that the state allow us to manage the “pay-to-stay” program in which
we would provide training, program compliance auditing and facility management
software to participating shelters. Conversions would be the quickest way to
start rehabilitating the homeless. It would also allow such shelters to grow,
helping to get people off the streets as quickly as possible.
Building
New Facilities
1Bed4All
also proposes that the state fund the project to build pay-to-stay facilities
throughout the state. The cost to build a 928-bed facility is approximately 4
million dollars. If there are 90,000 homeless people living on the streets, we
would need to build 97 facilities at the cost of 388 million dollars.
For
every 4 million dollars, we can rehabilitate 928 people at a time, forever.
County
Participation
1Bed4all
would require the corporation of county governments to make this solution
possible. Social services would have to ensure facility residents receive $6 a
day ($183 a month) for EBT food and $6 a day ($183 a month) for EBT cash. It
would also be important that resident Medi-Cal applications were processed in a
timely manner. We would strongly suggest that participating counties relocate
appropriate staffing to the facilities.
Also,
to be able to build facilities for 4 million dollars, land would need to be
donated for use. Utilizing unused asphalt parking lots owned by counties or the
state would be perfect for these facility builds.
Stop
Wasting, Start Fixing!
Comments
Post a Comment